Saturday, January 7, 2012

File sharing as religious community in Sweden

(AP) ? A file-sharing group in Sweden that considers itself a spiritual organization says the government has recognized it as a religious community.

Isak Gerson, 20, said Thursday that his Church of Kopimism received that approval in late December, but the government agency was closed for the day and couldn't be reached to confirm that.

Gerson said the church's roughly 3,000 members meet every week to share files of music, films and other content they consider holy and regard copying as a sacrament.

Sweden's government defines such communities as ones that conduct religious activities and services, entitling them to apply for state funding and the right to marry couples.

Sweden also has recognized believers of Norse paganism, elves and gnomes as religious communities.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2012-01-05-EU-Sweden-File-Sharing-Religion/id-482e02e49942491a87a7f6fc89dedb3c

big game jeremy london jeremy london butterball turkey fryer butterball turkey fryer yale harvard dan henderson

Kallis' career best put South Africa in control

Jacques Kallis' career-best 224 has put South Africa in control of the third cricket test against Sri Lanka in Cape Town


Jacques Kallis' career-best 224 has put South Africa in control of the third cricket test against Sri Lanka in Cape Town.

South Africa's declared its first innings closed at 580 for four.

Sri Lanka's 149 for two in reply.

? 2012?NZCity, NewsTalkZB

Source: http://home.nzcity.co.nz/news/article.aspx?id=141463&ref=rss

powerball winning numbers powerball winning numbers uc davis pepper spray uc davis pepper spray usc oregon breaking dawn part 2 breaking dawn part 2

Friday, January 6, 2012

Cancer issues expression of concern about two Henschke I-ELCAP ...

The journal Cancer has issued an Expression of Concern about two lung cancer screening papers long dogged by doubt.

Last April, The Cancer Letter and The New York Times jointly published an investigation into the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) run by Claudia Henschke and David Yankelevitz. Other researchers had already criticized the design and conclusions of that trial, but as the investigation noted,?an October 2008 review of the study found that the researchers couldn?t find 90 percent of the subjects? consent forms, an ethical no-no that jeopardizes as many as 135 papers.

Two papers published in Cancer, in 2000 and 2001, are among those?studies, according to the notice?(links added), which credits the Times and The Cancer Letter and notes that the journal has referred the case to Federal investigators:

Cancer is publishing an Editorial Expression of Concern regarding the following articles:

??Early Lung Cancer Action Project: Overall Design and Findings From Baseline Screening?? by Claudia I. Henschke (Cancer. 2000;89(suppl 11):2474-2482).

??Early Lung Cancer Action Project: Initial Findings on Repeat Screenings?? by Claudia I. Henschke, David P. Naidich, David F. Yankelevitz, Georgeann McGuinness, Dorothy I. McCauley, James P. Smith, Daniel Libby, Mark Pasmantier, Madeline Vazquez, June Koizumi, Douglas Flieder, Nasser Altorki, and Olli S. Miettinen (Cancer. 2001;92:153-159).

This Expression of Concern is based on an April 29, 2011, article in The New York Times as well as the April 29, 2011, issue of The Cancer Letter, both of which disclosed details of a report of an Independent Scientific Review Committee (Review Committee) convened by Weill Cornell Medical College to investigate the scientific research conducted as part of the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP). The Review Committee reported, among other things, that the I-ELCAP lacked positive confirmation of valid informed consent for all subjects at all sites by the coordinating center.

The information contained in the Review Committee?s report raises issues that cannot be fully investigated by the journal. We have therefore referred this matter to the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Human Research Protections.

Based on the information we have received thus far, we are issuing this Expression of Concern to alert our readers.

The notices also refers to an April?11, 2008?Publisher?s Note about the study that detailed a number of financial conflicts of interest, including patent applications, that Henschke had failed to disclose when she submitted the papers.

The 2000 paper has been cited 62 times, according to Thomson Scientific?s Web of Knowledge, while the 2001 paper has been cited 267.

A separate?2010 study by the National Cancer Institute, the National Lung Screening Trial, validated the general principle behind the I-ELCAP trial.

We?ll update this post as we learn more.

Like this:

Be the first to like this post.

Source: http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/cancer-issues-expression-of-concern-about-two-henschke-i-elcap-lung-cancer-screening-papers/

brownback brownback salvia cybermonday deals cybermonday deals steve johnson norman reedus

Curbing drunk drivers: Ignition locks on all cars?

By msnbc.com's Jim Gold

Connecticut motorists convicted of drunken driving are the latest to face mandatory use of ignition interlock devices, a step seen by some as steering the nation closer to requiring alcohol detection systems as standard equipment in all vehicles.

Pushed by Mothers Against Drunk Driving, Connecticut on Jan. 1 joined 14 other states with ignition-interlock mandates for drivers caught with blood-alcohol content above the legal limit, even for first-time offenders. A similar pilot program is under way in four California counties.


At least 24 other states mandate Breathalyzer-like locks for so-called hard-core drunken drivers who include repeat offenders or those caught with alcohol levels of .15 or more.

MADD

This chart from Mothers Against Drunk Driving shows the status of ignition interlock laws across the country. Legislation is pending for interlock mandates for even first-time offenders in Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Wisconsin.

Other states leave the penalty of interlock ignitions to the discretion of judges. Some states, such as Nebraska, reduce license revocation periods for convicted motorists who agree to use ignition interlocks.

States in general require?convicted motorists to pay for the devices.

NBCConnecticut.com: First-time drunken drivers to get ignition locks

MADD launched its 50-state effort to eliminate drunken driving in 2006, when only one state, New Mexico, mandated ignition interlocks for even first-time drunken drivers, said Frank Harris, MADD?s manager of state legislative affairs.

Previously the focus was on hard-core drunken drivers and suspending their licenses, a punishment ignored by up to 75 percent of convicted motorists, he said.

"It makes me sick to my stomach to see people drive drunk with a BAC of .08 to .14 and not be categorized as hardcore drunk driving offenders,"?Harris said.

"DUI or DWI laws are very complicated," Harris said. "The ignition interlock is just part of the approach to assure the offender must prove sobriety and assure swift punishment," he said.

The devices are designed to prevent a car from starting if a driver who blows into it has an?alcohol level above a certain point. Technological advances ? including cameras on the device ? make it tougher to get around the systems. People previously thought they could have sober friends blow into the devices to get their cars started.

Legal reforms with ignition-interlock mandates not only reinforce a state?s commitment to halting drunken driving, but also effectively reduce re-arrest rates by 67 percent, said Harris.

The recidivism figure is also cited by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mandating ignition interlocks is the CDC?s top recommendation for reducing the approximately 11,000 alcohol-related driving deaths yearly, which it says is about a third of all driving deaths.

But the American Beverage Institute fears mandates go too far?and it wants judges to stay in the picture, said Sarah Longwell, the restaurant trade group?s managing director.

"There is a distinction between somebody who is one sip over the legal limit and the type of person who has 10 drinks," Longwell told msnbc.com. "The judicial system should be involved in those cases," she said.

"Restaurants prefer 10 people come in and have one drink each than one person order 10 drinks," she said.

A 120-pound woman who has two glasses of wine with dinner metabolizes alcohol differently than the 10-drink offender, she said.

A judge, not legal mandates, should decide about ignition interlocks at the lighter levels, she said.

The spread of mandates and discussion of ignition interlocks will "prime the public" for the day when the government requires auto manufacturers to install even more-sophisticated alcohol-detection devices as original equipment, Longwell said.

The Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety, funded in part by automakers and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, says it is working on "potential technologies that could detect alcohol from air samples in the vehicle passenger compartment, through the driver?s skin using tissue spectroscopy, from emissions through the skin, from eye movements, and from driving performance." (Wired takes?detailed look at DADSS.)

"Why wouldn?t you want that?" Longwell asked.

The problem is in the details of where maximum alcohol levels are set. They won?t be at .08, she predicted, because if someone drinks five shots and hops behind the steering wheel, the driver's blood level won't cross the .08 threshold for a while. No one has the answer yet on how low to set cutoff sensors, she said.

Follow Jim Gold on Facebook.

Should ignition interlocks be mandated for all motorists convicted of drunken driving, even first-time offenders?

Source: http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/05/9957132-curbing-drunken-drivers-should-ignition-interlock-be-required-on-every-car

zooey deschanel michael jordan ryan braun yvette prieto hypertrophic cardiomyopathy maurice sendak kaye stevens

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Stirring up a fight, Obama names consumer watchdog (AP)

SHAKER HEIGHTS, Ohio ? Defying Republican lawmakers, President Barack Obama on Wednesday barreled by the Senate and installed a national consumer watchdog on his own, provoking GOP threats of a constitutional showdown in the courts. Setting a fierce tone in the election-year fight for middle-class voters, Obama said: "I refuse to take `no' for an answer."

Obama named Richard Cordray, a respected former attorney general of Ohio, to be the first director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, after giving up on hopes for a confirmation vote in the Senate. The appointment means the agency is able to oversee a vast swath of lending companies and others accused at times of preying on consumers with shady practices.

In political terms, Obama's move was unapologetically brazen, the equivalent of a haymaker at Republicans in the Senate who had blocked his nominee. Acting right after Tuesday's presidential caucuses in Iowa, which showered attention on his opponents, Obama sought to make a splash as the one fighting for the rights of the little guy.

Presidents of both parties long have gotten around a stalled confirmation by naming a nominee to a job when the Senate is on a break through a process known as a recess appointment.

But Obama went further by squeezing in his appointment during a break between rapid Senate sessions this week, an unusual move that the GOP called an arrogant power grab.

The White House said what the Senate was doing ? gaveling in and out of session every few days solely to avoid being in recess ? was a sham. Obama's aides said the president would not be stopped by a legislative gimmick, even though it was Senate Democrats who began the practice to halt President George W. Bush's appointments.

"When Congress refuses to act, and as a result hurts our economy and puts people at risk, I have an obligation as president to do what I can without them," Obama said from Ohio, a state vital to Obama's re-election bid.

Consumer groups hailed Obama's decision; the U.S. Chamber of Commerce balked and warned it was so legally shaky that consumer bureau's work may be compromised.

The response from Republicans was blistering.

The top Senate Republican, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, said Obama had "arrogantly circumvented the American people" and endangered the nation's systems of checks and balances. Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah called it a "very grave decision by this heavy-handed, autocratic White House."

And House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said: "It's clear the president would rather trample our system of separation of powers than work with Republicans to move the country forward. This action goes beyond the president's authority, and I expect the courts will find the appointment to be illegitimate."

Mitt Romney, a leading Republican presidential candidate, accused Obama of displaying "Chicago-style politics at its worst."

It was not immediately clear who might file a suit on the matter. Most likely, a private party regulated by the consumer agency would have the legal standing.

More than a standoff over one significant appointment, the fight speaks to the heart of a presidential campaign under way.

Obama is presiding over a troubled but improving economy. To try to win over voters, he is employing two strategies: in-your-face politics against a Congress held in low public regard, and a campaign pitch that he would represent the crunched middle class better than any of the Republicans he would face.

The Cordray appointment fits both.

Only with a director in place can the consumer bureau keep "dishonest" mortgage companies, payday lenders, debt collectors and others from harming consumers, Obama said. Speaking from a high school in the Cleveland suburb of Shaker Heights, Obama said Republicans were only blocking Cordray because they wanted to water down consumer protections.

Republican senators have called the consumer bureau too powerful and unaccountable, and held off on Cordray's bid as a means to get changes.

Cordray essentially starts right away, although his nomination will become official later in the week, the White House said. He is expected to serve until at least the end of 2013, which is the end of the Senate's next session.

In plowing ahead, the White House had to contend with some uncomfortable history.

Just last year, a lawyer from Obama's Justice Department said the office's view was that recess appointments could only come during legislative breaks of more than three days. That doesn't match up with what Obama did with Cordray, since the Senate was technically just in session on Tuesday.

The Senate's top Democrat, Harry Reid of Nevada, said in 2007 he would keep the Senate in "pro forma" sessions to block Bush from making an end run around the Senate and the Constitution with controversial nominations. That's exactly what Obama's White House now calls a gimmick. Yet on Wednesday, Reid came out in support of what Obama did.

As a senator in 2005, Obama opposed the recess nomination of John Bolton to be the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, saying at the time that a representative who couldn't get through a Senate confirmation would be "damaged goods" with less credibility. Obama spokesman Jay Carney said Obama was just talking about the merits of the Bolton pick.

Obama certainly hasn't opposed recess appointments as president.

He had made 28 recess appointments before Wednesday, then named Cordray and three members to the National Labor Relations Board.

Bush made more than 170 such appointments when the Senate was away.

At the heart of the conflict this time is the arcane matter of what, exactly, constitutes a congressional recess.

White House lawyers ultimately determined that, for all practical purposes, the Senate is in the midst of about a monthlong break and Obama can move ahead as he pleases.

___

Feller reported from Washington. Associated Press writer Erica Werner contributed to this report.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120105/ap_on_bi_ge/us_obama

rachel zoe nfl playoff schedule 2012 mt rainier national park penn state football rose parade mount rainier national park drop dead gorgeous

India's sub-$50 Android tablet claims 1.4 million orders in two weeks

How popular is the world cheapest tablet? Pretty darn popular, it seems. The Aakash has already notched up 1.4 million bookings since going up for sale on December 14th, not massively surprising given the $41 (2,500 rupee) price tag. An upgraded version is already planned for March, with three new factories planned to each produce 75,000 new units per month. If a sub-$50 tablet is still too expensive for your tastes, then you may be happy to hear that the price should still sink as low as $35 and could even be pushed as low as $10. At that price, we'll take five.

India's sub-$50 Android tablet claims 1.4 million orders in two weeks originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:31:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Physorg  |  sourceAFP  | Email this | Comments


Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/RwXOregLCrY/

steve williams koch brothers weather phoenix dippin dots triumph the insult comic dog tucson weather tucson weather

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

M 1.0, Southern California

Magnitude1.0Date-Time
  • Tuesday, January 03, 2012 at 18:40:59 UTC
  • Tuesday, January 03, 2012 at 10:40:59 AM at epicenter
Location34.152?N, 117.034?WDepth10.3 km (6.4 miles)RegionSOUTHERN CALIFORNIADistances
  • 9 km (6 miles) SE (132?) from Running Springs, CA
  • 13 km (8 miles) NE (39?) from Mentone, CA
  • 14 km (8 miles) N (6?) from Yucaipa, CA
  • 24 km (15 miles) E (84?) from San Bernardino, CA
  • 112 km (70 miles) E (84?) from Los Angeles Civic Center, CA
Location Uncertaintyhorizontal +/- 0.4 km (0.2 miles); depth +/- 1.3 km (0.8 miles)ParametersNph= 34, Dmin=8 km, Rmss=0.24 sec, Gp= 65?,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=0SourceEvent IDci11049325

Source: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/ci11049325.php

cory smoot do a barrel roll jimmy kimmel tilt do a barrel roll. fsu football fsu football